THE ORGANIZATION Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

THE ORGANIZATION - Course go ExampleIn this case study, the father son duo have diametrically resistance drawship styles, wherein the father Peter believes in an extremely friendly business environment marked by Participative leadership, the son Joseph is seen to portray the typical character of an distinguished leader. It is stated that Peter is a man of charisma and has a dynamic personality some scholars like Rowe and Guerrero argue that charisma is a necessary contour for leadership (Rowe and Guerrero, 2011, 260). A charismatic leader can ensure that the workforce will follow in his footsteps, and consider him to be right, instead of doubting in the effectiveness of the leader. With such personality traits Peter could have chosen to be an autocratic leader who leads from the front and gives orders, such that they would be followed since the staff believes in him and is apply and Peter trusts them. However, he chose to be a democratic leader or in other words, a participative leader (Appel and Schmid, 2003, 22). The name itself suggests that the characteristics of such a leader do not revolve around strictness and authoritative rule, but allows for participation and a democratic way of end making. On the other frigid side is the leadership style adapted by the bright but not brilliant Joseph. He is categorized as having adapted the authoritative or autocratic leadership style which is recognized as being a iodin man show, since the leader does not allow for participation in decision making, delegation of duties is not carried out, there is lack of trust of the leader in the staff and vice versa, thus the opposite of democratic leadership. Leadership is cited as one of the crucial reasons behind the decision of managerial staff to leave a labor (Hogan, 2007, 38), thus the fact that under Peters leadership well-nigh all employees have been retained by the organization for at least 10 years is a substantial proof of his effective leadership, and that h e is welcomed by his staff. When this factor is considered for Josephs leadership, it was observed that the employees were not happy, which can be figured out from the statement by Mr. Spike who told Joseph that he just couldnt work in this climate, hence showing that employee turnover would be high as even the most loyal and senior manager wants to quit the job under Josephs leadership. Furthermore, Peter does not practice a laissez-faire leadership style or a rigid leadership style, since his delegation of duty and decision making is coupled with regular inspections of the efficiency and quality of work and the organization on the whole. He believes in motivation through praise, and thus has make it a regular practice to praise good work, and simultaneously pointing out flaws and inefficiency in all work done by the staff, but since he is so accommodating and open to his staff, it automatically leads to a welcoming response and the staff does not mind if he points out flaws, but on the contrary regards his comments as constructive criticism. While, on the other side, autocratic leaders such as Joseph, believe in meeting rigid targets, and do not allow for any suggestions, it is their personal style of motivation, however apart from the positive aspect of speeding up the process, it