Discuss: The ethical problems and issues faced by archaeology in terms of questions like "who owns the past?"

These ethical concerns fall into three broad areas. First, there is the chief of how to action human remains. Over the past few years, archaeologists drive often come into conflict with indigenous peoples over the shackles and handling of excavated human remains. In Belgium and France, where the first-world-war battlefields are dangerous places even so today, with unexploded shells, making excavation a potentially deadly activity, the situation is particularly complex because the allied armies included soldiers from a variety of faiths and ethnicities, including Africans, Indians, Australians and Native Americans, all of whose traditions may prefer to turn remains differently. Next is the question of ownership of artifacts. In the theory of first-world-war sites, local people armed with metal detectors routinely induce in medals and other memorabilia. The sale of such(prenominal) items has provided an important commencement of income ever since refugees first returne d to the area after the conflict. Archaeologists, though, regard such activities as looting. Around the world, the general question of who has the first train on buried items local people, the descendants of the original owners or archaeologists is deep controversial.

A third ethical problem concerns the conservation of sites. Should battlefields be left alone as memorials, redeveloped for tourism, or bear on for the archaeologists of the future(a)? Archaeologists increasingly consider the third option as in recent years, they have become more selective well-nigh what and where they dig, so that they do not prec lude investigations by outcome generations! . If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay